Supervisory Board
of the National Holding Board and
Hungarian State Holding Company
Audit Policy of
Hungarian State Holding Company
Approved in the Supervisory Board Meeting of 11 March 2008
(signed)
Dr. Attila Borbély
Chairman of the Supervisory Board
Audit Policy of the Hungarian State Holding Company
Chapter I
Preamble
1. Based on its procedures adopted in the Resolution of the Supervisory
Board No. EB 1/2007. (XI. 29.) and approved by the Exerciser of the Shareholder
Rights (ESR) on 12 December 2007, the Supervisory Board approves the Audit Policy
set out below in order to ensure the practical applicability of the provisions
set out in Article 13 (3) of Act CVI of 2007 on state assets (State Assets Act,
SAA), with particular regard to the method of and deadline for providing information
requested in the course of audit activities performed on the basis of this Policy,
as well as the validity of the authorisation set out in point 2.
2. Having regard to the provisions of Articles 12 (1) and 13 (3) of the
SAA, the Chairman of the Supervisory Board gives general and ad hoc authorisations
as needed to the members of the Supervisory Board, the Head and the employees
of the Audit Directorate, for the purpose of pursuing audit activities set out
in detail this Policy.
Title 1
Scope of the Policy
3. This Policy contains the audit rules applicable to the Audit Directorate
operating within the Organisation of Framework of Magyar Nemzeti Vagyonkezelő
Zártkörűen működő Részvénytársaság (Hungarian State Holding Company, hereinafter
by the Hungarian abbreviation MNV Zrt.), professional direction, for which is
provided by the National Holding Board and the Supervisory Board of MNV Zrt. (Supervisory
Board). The Policy sets out the tasks associated with the Management of State
Assets, continuous control over the administration of privatisation transactions,
as well as the ongoing audit of the operation and utilisation of MNV Zrt’s own
assets and other asset components entrusted to MNV Zrt. based on the SAA or other
legislation.
4. The personal scope of this Policy covers members of the Asset Management
Council, of the Supervisory Board, as well as all of MNV Zrt’s organisation units
and employees, based on the ESR’s approval set out in point 1.
5. The scope of this Policy shall cover auditing all activities related
to both MNV Zrt’s own assets and the state assets entrusted to it. The contents
of audits shall be determined by the SAA, Act No. IV of 2006 on business companies
(Companies Act) and other related legislation.
6 All of MNV Zrt’s organisational units and employees must assist audit
activities of the bodies and authorities that perform external audits over MNV
Zrt. within their roles and responsibilities.
Title 2
The general goal, system and organisational forms of audits
7. The general goal of audit is to continuously assess and evaluate the
proficiency and regularity of the activities of the National Holding Board (Council)
and MNV Zrt in order to promote lawful and efficient operation.
Audits shall include in general:
a) compliance with legislation and internal requirements
applicable to the audited activity,
b) the documentary discipline in operation,
c) the regulated, organised and reasonable nature of
operation,
d) commenting on all reports to be submitted by the
Council to the ESR,
e) analyses of decisions made within MNV Zrt’s organisation
for economical purposes.
8. MNV Zrt.’s complex audit system includes:
a) the audit activities by the management,
b) the audit built into the process of activities, and
c) audits conducted by the organisation units performing
audits.
9. In accordance with the Rules of Organisation and Operation (ROO) approved
in ESR Resolution No. 4/2007. (XI.28.), there are three independent audit organisations
working within MNV Zrt’s organisation:
a) the Audit Directorate, operating with professional direction
provided by the Supervisory Board, which performs comprehensive audit tasks of
the Council and MNV Zrt.,
b) the Internal Audit Office, with professional direction from
the Chief Executive Officer, which performs shareholder audit tasks for managing
state assets allocated to MNV Zrt. and internal management audit tasks,
c) the Supervisory Board of the National Land Fund, which
audits the Company’s activities associated with the National Land Fund.
10. For the purposes of cooperation between the three audit bodies identified
in point 9, the provisions of this Policy, drafted on the basis of the procedures
approved by the ESR, and of the Shareholder Audit Policy approved by the Council
shall govern.
Title 3
Audit in the activities of the Council and of MNV Zrt.
11. The operation of and management of state assets by the Council and MNV
Zrt. are audited by the Supervisory Board. The Audit Directive promotes the successful
performance of the Supervisory Board’s tasks set out in Article 35 (2), (3) and
(4) of the Company’s Act and Articles 12 and 13 of the SAA, and the efficient
operation of the audit system.
12. In line with the provisions of MNV Zrt’s ROO, the Audit Directorate is
managed and supervised by the Chairman of the Supervisory Board; the detailed
rules in this respect are set out in the Supervisory Board’s procedures.
Chapter II
Title 1
The goal of audit activities of the Supervisory Board and the Audit Directorate
operating with professional direction from the Supervisory Board
13. The purpose of audit is to continuously monitor:
a) the operation of the Council and of MNV Zrt., compliance
with the SAA and Government Decree No. 254/2007. (X.4.) issued on the implementation
of the SAA as well as legislation in force,
b) whether the decisions made are lawful, economical and reasonable,
c) the development of internal regulations and procedures
required for MNV Zrt’s operation, in line with legislation,
d) MNV Zrt.’s operation for the purposes of compliance with
the requirements of internal regulations,
e) whether MNV Zrt.’s internal accounting and information
system is capable of recording and reflecting actual financial transactions,
f) MNV Zrt.’s audit system and its functioning for the purposes
of evaluating whether it ensures the enforcement of requirements set out in the
SAA and other legislation as well as this Policy.
Title 2
Rights and obligations of the Audit Directorate
14. The rights of the Audit Directorate are in particular:
a) in order to compile work plans and to perform the obligation
of continuously providing information, it is entitled to continuously be informed
about the proposals and decisions submitted to the Council, the Management Meeting
and other decision-making fora.
b) based on the work plan approved by the Supervisory Board,
the Supervisory Board’s resolutions and the authorisation granted in point 2,
it is entitled to conduct investigations associated with activities related to
own assets and the management or utilization of allocated assets. In the framework
of this – as set out in the Supervisory Board’s procedures – it is entitled to
request information from MNV Zrt’s employees, look into the Company’s books, documents,
official documents, inspect or if necessary, have experts inspect such documentation.
Furthermore, it is entitled to propose on-site audits at the audited company with
the participation of the Chairman of the Council and/or Chief Executive Officer
of MNV Zrt.
c) it is entitled to organise and conduct the meetings, discussions,
etc. required for completing audits.
d) it is entitled to attend meetings associated with the issues
audited by the Supervisory Board – which, however, are not closely related to
the audit – based on prior permission from the Chairman of the Council and/or
the CEO.
e) it is entitled to request statements of completeness of
the documents delivered from members of the Council as well as executive officers
of MNV Zrt. and the heads of the audited units.
f) it is entitled to conduct follow-up audits to investigate the measures taken to eliminate the deficiencies
exposed during audits.
g) it is entitled to review and comment on the Company’s internal
regulations, procedures for giving instructions and general procedures
15. The obligations of the Audit Directorate are in particular:
a) safeguarding state secrets, service secrets, business secrets
and information concerning moral rights obtained in the course of audits,
b) to notify the Chairman of the Council and/or the Chief Executive
Officer by way of the Chairman of the Supervisory Board about the commencement
of the audit – depending on the nature and target of the audit – in due time,
c) to conduct the audits specified in the resolutions of the Supervisory
Board based on the Supervisory Board’s work plan, to verify the content and reality
of the data and documents that serve as the basis of findings, and to record the
facts exposed as they actually are,
d) to inform the relevant audited parties about the audit materials
and findings prepared.
Title 3
Duties of the Audit Directorate
16. The Audit Directorate performs its activities under the directions of the
Supervisory Board member(s) appointed in the Supervisory Board’s work plan, in
the framework of which it has the tasks of:
a) auditing the activities of the Council and MNV Zrt., the implementation of legislation
and resolutions based on the legislation, founder’s resolutions, council and Supervisory
Board resolutions that provide for audits and the procedures of the Supervisory
Board,
b) auditing the annual report, balance sheet, asset statement adopted by the Council,
as well as all proposals and reports prepared and adopted by the Council, which
are subject to the ESR’s exclusive powers,
c) auditing and commenting on the Company’s internal regulations and their harmonisation
with effective legislation applicable to MNV Zrt.
d) promoting the state audit office’s audit activities required under the SAA,
e) performing the audit tasks associated with the Supervisory Board’s
work plan,
f) ensuring that the Supervisory Board is continuously provided with
information, in the framework of which, of arrangements for making available the
reports and information containing external and internal information on MNV Zrt’s
activities,
g) liaising with external audit bodies, in particular the State Audit
Office and MNV Zrt’s Auditor,
h) investigating the complaints and reports of public interest received
by the Supervisory Board and the Audit Directorate if the Supervisory Board orders
such an investigation by a resolution,
i) performing the actions related to preparing and conducting audits,
preparing a course, elaborating the necessary proposals for actions, determining
liability, closing the audit and registering audits,
j) performing the coordination and administrative tasks associated with
the Supervisory Board’s activities, as well as the secretarial tasks for the Supervisory
Board.
Chapter III
Procedures of the Audit Directorate
17. The Head of the Audit Directorate ensures that all audits ordered by the
Supervisory Board in a resolution are conducted in a proficient and lawful manner,
in accordance with this Policy. If, based on the Supervisory Board’s decision,
external experts are involved in the audit process, the Head of the Audit Directorate
will prepared draft assignment agreement.
18. The following need to be taken into account in the course of preparing
audits:
a) the target and program of any specific audit is developed in the stage of preparing
for the audit based on the Supervisory Board’s resolution ordering the audit,
with direction from the Supervisory Board member performing the audit.
b) the major areas to be audited shall be specified by means of information and
analysis during preparation.
c) audits may be comprehensive, topical, target and follow-up audits.
d) the documents, official documents and statements required for audits must be
requested for the audit from Council members and/or executive officers of MNV
Zrt., by setting an appropriate deadline. In case of using an external expert,
having regard to the valid internal regulations – the draft assignment agreement
shall be prepared, which shall detail the tasks of the expert. The Chairman of
the Supervisory Board must send this Draft Assignment Agreement to the Chief Executive
Officer for signature.
19. Audits must be conducted based on the official documents, documents and
accounting documents made available as specified above, and it must be verified
whether the contents of such documents are true and fair.
20. The Chairman of the Council and the Chief Executive Officer must ensure
the conditions for the audit, in the framework of which they must appoint a Contact
Officer within the audited organisational unit.
21. The Head of the Audit Directorate or the Audit Directorate member authorised
to do so shall be entitled to:
a) request information or statements related to the audit from the organisational
units and/or persons designated in accordance with point 20 in connection with
the audit, to hear the relevant person of necessary, and to look into the audited
organisational unit’s documents associated with their audited transactions (in
compliance with confidentiality rules);
b) prepare copies or abstracts of documentation,
c) to remove a copy of any original document certified by the party delivering the
document and the Head of the Audit Directorate together, if necessary for the
audit, in particular if there is reason to believe that the document may be falsified
or destroyed.
22. The person conducting the audit must determine his findings always having
reward to effective legislation, as well as internal regulations and instructions
made in compliance with legislation.
23. The findings, the experience gained during the audit and proposals for
eliminating deficiencies must be set out in writing in the form of a report.
24. The audit report is the basic document of audits. The audit report may
set out only findings that the person conducting the audit is able to properly
substantiate by documents and statements. The audit report is deemed to be a draft
until it is discussed by the Supervisory Board, which ordered the audit in a resolution,
and approves it in a separate resolution.
25. The draft audit report must be signed by the Supervisory Board member(s)
leading the audit, the Audit Manager conducting the audit and the Head of the
Audit Directorate. The draft audit report prepared shall be submitted to the Supervisory
Board meeting for decision-making by the Supervisory Board member assigned to
lead the audit according to the work plan. The Supervisory Board decides on the
approval and further fate of the audit report in a resolution.
26. The audit report includes:
a) the facts emphasised for the purpose of evaluating the issues audited; the findings
must be grouped in a sequence by importance in a way so that the facts are explained
one after the other to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the activities of
the audited organisational unit or the subject matter of the audit,
b) the error(s) found and their consequences as well as the general conclusions
that may be drawn,
c) if the audit finds any regularity that caused financial damage, in addition to
determining the amount of the damage, the possibility of holding specific persons
accountable must also be investigated,
d) proposals for eliminating errors and possible accountability; in addition to
the substantial deficiencies, the major components that act in favour of development,
correct initiatives and all significant external circumstances and affected the
occurrence of errors must be recorded.
27. The experience gained during the audit – by setting out only the substantial
findings – must be summarised in a way so that:
a) the report explains – in addition to the errors and deficiencies reported – the
nature of omissions, their causes inherent in the system and the circumstances
prompting the omissions are apparent;
b) positive facts and solutions to be encouraged should also be properly emphasised;
c) the summary should offer a full and fair picture of the audited organisational
unit’s work done in the audited area or the given topic including changes compared
to the period last audited;
d) the facts established in the audit report should be true and fair, and financial
documents may be attached to report to ensure this if necessary.
28. In the event that personal accountability arises:
a) the relevant part of the report discussed and approved in a resolution by the
Supervisory Board must be sent to the person(s) indicated as accountable persons
in the report together with the liability clause. (Annex).
b) the addressee of the clause must return the close after signing to the Audit
Directorate within eight workdays of receipt.
c) by signing the clause, the person concerned testifies that he is aware the contents
of the report and makes a statements on whether he recognises his accountability.
At the same time, he may make comments and submit evidence. If the person concerned
fails to receive the document or to sign the clause, this must be recorded on
the document.
d) the signed liability clause and any comments on it made by the person conducting
the audit must be attached to the report approved earlier by the Supervisory Board
in a resolution.
e) this supplemented report must be submitted to the Supervisory Board again for
a final position. If the need for determining liability under civil law, labour
law or criminal law of the person concerned arises, the Supervisory Board shall
decide on further actions to be taken in a separate resolution, and will send
this resolution to the parties concerned as set out in its procedures.
29. Based on the findings and proposals set out in the audit, measures shall
be proposed and taken as follows:
a) the Head of the Supervisory Board sends the audit report discussed and approved
in a resolution by the Supervisory Board to the Chairman of the Council and the
Chief Executive Officer of MNV Zrt. – by way of the Audit Directorate – for written
comments.
b) within the deadline specified by the Chairman of the Supervisory Board in writing
for the audit report distributed according to paragraph a), the Chairman of the Council and/or the Chief Executive Officer may make written
comments to the Chairman of the Supervisory Board and the Supervisory Board. The
comments shall include any different technical position concerning the audit,
as well as any other comments and proposals.
c) if justified by the contents of the audit report – in particular if a more severe
case of personal accountability arises, and also if the organisation unit concerned
by the audit contests the findings – the Supervisory Board member(s) responsible
for the audit shall propose a reconciliation meeting. The Supervisory Board member
responsible for the audit, the Head of the Audit Directorate, the Chairman of
the Council and/or the representative of the organisational unit concerned by
the audit designated by the Chief Executive Officer, and parties directly concerned
by the audit attend the reconciliation meeting. Other persons may be involved
in reconciliation as necessary.
d) a memorandum must be prepared about the reconciliation meeting, which shall contain
the different positions of those in attendance concerning the audit, as well as
the agreed final position concerning the findings and proposals set out in the
audit report. The Supervisory Board member leading the audit again submits the
report together with the memorandum to the Supervisory Board for a resolution.
30. The audit report may be deemed to be finalised if:
a) the commenting procedure described in point 29 a) took place by the relevant
deadline and the rules no need to hold a reconciliation meeting,
b) no comments were made within the deadline set,
c) if a reconciliation meeting took place, the report has been supplemented based
on the memorandum taken about the reconciliation meeting, in a resolution of the
Supervisory Board.
31. The Chairman of the Supervisory Board sends the finalised audit report to
the Exerciser of Shareholder Rights and the Chairman of the State Audit Office
for information. The finalised audit report must also be sent to the Chairman
of the Council and the Chief Executive Officer for information or for further
action if necessary.
32. Based on a proposal from the Audit Directorate, the Supervisory Board approves
the rescheduling of audit tasks included in the semi-annual or annual work plan
in a resolution.
Chapter IV
Rights and obligations of the organisational units involved in audits
33. The head of the organisational unit involved in the audit and/or the person(s)
in connection with whom the issue of accountability arises are entitled to be
informed about the findings set out in audit reports and to make comments on such
findings according to the provisions of points 15 d), 28 and 29.
34. The heads and staff of organisation units involved in audits must promote
the unimpeded processing of audit by providing the necessary documents and information
in full – within the areas in their powers – in accordance with the instructions
of the Chairman of the Council and the Chief Executive Officer.
Chapter V
Cooperation between audit organisations
35. Cooperation between the audit organisations operating independently within
MNV Zrt’s organisations performing different functions – shall be governed by
the agreed position of the Chairman of the National Holding Board and of the Supervisory
Board of the Hungarian State Holding Company, the Chairman of the Supervisory
Board of the National Land Fund and the Chief Executive Officer of MNV Zrt.
Chapter VI
Coming into force
The Supervisory Board has discussed this Audit Policy in its Meeting held on
11 March 2008 and adopted it in Resolution No. 12 /2008. (III.11.).
(signed)
Dr. Attila Borbély
Chairman of the Supervisory Board
I approve the procedure of the Supervisory Board on 12 December 2007 based on
which I acknowledge the Audit Policy of Hungarian State Holding Company.
Budapest, 7 April 2008.
(signed)
(round seal: Minister of Finance)
Exerciser of Shareholder Rights
Annex
Accountability clause:
(name, title)
I, the undersigned ………………………………….. hereby declare that I am aware of the findings
included in the report on the audit of ……………………………………… concerning my personal
accountability. My comments on this: I recognise/ I do not recognise my liability.
I understand that I may make written comments – and ma specify and submit any
written documentation and other evidence available to me – within 8 working days
from the date written below.
Budapest, …………................. 2008
…………………………………..
signature